Now that you have gone over both readings, write a short paragraph in which you compare the two. How are they alike?

Both readings communicate the fact that  slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is  more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious  context.

Explanation:

Both the readings reflect the fact that slavery is  and criminal in nature and its a sinful act to slave an individual  ,the reading also indicate that they don t support such practice. Both the readings shows individuals dealing with the hardship of slavery and both the reading also display their protest against the Fugitive Slave Act.

Thus we can summarize that

Both readings communicate the fact that  slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is  more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious  context.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

these civilizations were located around fertile rivers, where they could produce an abundance of crops