Should the atomic bomb have been used on japan? Why or why not? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson

Well I can’t support my claim with evidence from your lesson, but I can say this.

The atomic bombs never should have been used. The first one was expected and I could see if I wasn’t a pacifist, but the second was absolutely uncalled for. That one was simply targeted at innocent civilians and the effects of Nagisaki and Hiroshima are still present today.

The case was a u.s. supreme court decision that defined the scope of the u.s. congress's legislative power and how it relates to the powers of american state legislatures. the dispute in mcculloch involved the legality of the national bank and a tax that the state of maryland imposed on it.

She was one of the world's first female heads of state.