How were the approaches of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X different?

A.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.

B.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.

C.
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.

D.
King used the religion of Islam to support his ideas, while Malcolm X was a devoted Christian leader.

Unit 12 Lesson 2: Civil Rights and the Vietnam War Test

1) Voting - Intimidation and violence towards different races was common - Dining - Black customers were not served - Bus Rides - People of different races had to sit in different areas

2. B- King believed in civil disobedience

3. C - There were protests in many neighborhoods

4. Essay

5. D-It showed Kennedy’s confidence

6. Essay

7. B- The United States launched

8. C- More women started working

9. C- Young people rejected traditional

10. Top- bottom -Weapons testing - Rachel Carson - Many animals - The first Earth Day

11. C- Nixon met D- Nixon tried

12. D- to pressure President

13. B- Johnson supported Medicare

14. B- the My Lai Massacre

15. D- The number of troops at the end

16. The last 2 sentences..it occurred and the face

17. C- Opponents of the war refused

18. C- The accident caused

19. B- The counterculture pressured

20. D- The peace symbols hint

21. D- They fought for laws protecting

22. B- It required schools

23. B- having improved housing

24. a leader who led a strike - Cesar Chavez, a religious leader who led many nonviolent protests - Martin Luther King, Jr., a freedom rider who later became chairman - John Lewis

25. B - it was strongly opposed

26. B- It meant racial segregation

27. C- Protests accompanied

28. (at the top) Stokely Carmichael founded SNCC - The 1960s - The Blank Panther - Malcolm X (at the bottom)

29. D - He believed that violence

the enslavement and death of yeet

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (: