What should president andrew jackson have done as chief executive in response to the supreme court decision

please help .

Andrew Jackson should've followed the ruling of the supreme court

Explanation:

The conflict between Andrew Jackson and the supreme court revolve around Worcester v. Georgia. At that time, the Court ruled that the states should not be able to overrule the native Americans in deciding which person can get into their land and which person can.

Andrew Jackson did not agree with this decision. He wanted the government to have more power over the natives. so he decided to ignore the decision.

As a chief of the executive branch, Andrew Jackson's action can be considered as an embarrassment to  democracy. He did not respect the separation of power that became the foundation of its politic.

answer: in 1900, there were no "workplace safety laws"!

explanation: at the beginning of this century, workers in the united states faced remarkably high health and safety risks on the job.

a century ago in 1900 about three hundred out of every one hundred thousand miners were killed on the job each year.

[industria] developments occurred within a legal and regulatory climate that diminished employer’s interest in safety. as a result, americans developed production methods that were both highly productive and often very dangerous.