Based on the information in the map, which is the most logical conclusion that can be drawn about land disputes?

The country that controlled the most land would end up victorious in the event of war.
The native populations would align with France in any land struggle with the British.
Only one European power was sure to end up holding colonies in North America.
The overlapping land claims would cause rivalry that would result in warfare.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

this is true many people think today that blacks should be slaves also known as rasisim calling them many insults from slavery the idealogy of the south still exsist in some parts but not all