What did Cleveland imply when he stated "right and not might should be the rule of its [the United States'] conduct"?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What Cleveland implied when he stated "right and not might should be the rule of its [the United States'] conduct" was the following.

We are talking about the foreign policy of United States President Grover Cleveland, the 22nd and 24th president of the US. When he stated that "right and not might should be the rule of its [the United States'] conduct," he tried to express his anti-interventionist policy. He was opposed to expansionism. He considered that the US should focus on domestic issues. Imperialism was not part of his agenda.

the stone park

explanation:

sounds good to me

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.