PLEASE HELP ASAP :(
What was the US Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?

His present owner had to return him to his previous owner

His case could not be heard because he was not a citizen of the United States.

He should be freed immediately

He could not be freed because he was property

His case could not be heard because he wasn’t a citizen

Explanation:

Just because he had escaped and was living in a free territory didn’t mean he was actually free and it was decided he was unable to sue in federal court

britain's king george iii, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may the fundamental grounds upon which americans were taking up arms had shifted. that king george refused to so much as receive the

b) he seized power from the directory and appointed himself emperor

happy to

pls mark as brainliest