The narrator implies that Catherine Choose 1 a. did not have an enjoyable time at the ball. b. would rather not have to dance with anyone. c. had a fine time at the ball in spite of herself. d. does not like keeping the company of Mrs. Allen.

a. did not have an enjoyable time at the ball.

Explanation:

Jane Austen's novel Northanger Abbey tells the coming-of-age story of Catherine Morland. This novel deals with the theme of the loss of innocence and also depicts the typical Elizabethan society where wealth determines one's status.

Catherine had been invited by the family friend the Allens in Bath, where they had gone to a ball. But not being asked for a dance by anyone, Catherine felt bad and wishes that there was at least someone, anyone to talk to. She even implored on Mrs. Allen to try to find any acquaintance, asking her "are  you sure there is nobody you know in all this multitude of  people? I think you must know somebody" prompting her to sincerely tell her that she does not know anyone.

When asked by Mr. Allen whether she "had an agreeable ball" to which she replied "Very agreeable indeed" while at the same time "vainly endeavoring  to hide a great yawn". In this scene, the narrator implies that Catherine did not have an enjoyable time at the ball, despite the "multitude of people" who were in attendance.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

the communist manifesto is an 1848 political pamphlet by the german near the end of the manifesto, the authors call for a "forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions",  ..