Which of the following best describes a similarity between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts?

Complete Question:

Which of the following describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts?

A. Chief Joseph supported the reservation system for Native Americans, while Commissioner Parker condemned reservations.

B. Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

C. Chief Joseph sought additional support for agriculture on reservations, while Commissioner Parker called for industrialization on reservations.

D. Chief Joseph asserted that Native Americans should never interact with government officials, while Commissioner Parker argued that they should be represented in Washington.

Correct Option:

"Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations" describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts.

Option: B

Explanation:

Chief Joseph was the head of an indigenous people's party named "Wal-lam-wat-kain," a tribe of Native American citizens. Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a United States Civil War lieutenant. He was the Indian Affairs Commissioner which implied that he was responsible for monitoring the territories assigned to the Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians by the USA.

None of the tribes, for Parker, could assure them a government by which citizens would follow the law. It was a great deal of damage to him that the United States government permitted the Indians to think they were a sovereign or autonomous nation. Of this reason, Chief Joseph opposed the Americans when negotiating with them to move to a reservation.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (desert storm);

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this