What was one example of America's use of the "big stick" policy?

A. the objection to Germany and Britain's blockade of Venezuelan ports

B. the agreement to pay Panama $10 million and yearly rent of $250,000 for the Canal Zone

C. the dispatch of American troops to Nicaragua to protect its pro-American government

D. the government's purchase of a French route for a canal in Central America

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

confedracy

supported slavery

upheld the supremacy of federal laws

believed states should be able to nullify federal laws

union

wanted to abolish slavery

supported high tariffs

upheld the supremacy of federal laws

the answer to your question is

transform it from an expensive luxury to a mid-priced good

i really need the answer