History, 27.03.2020 08:01, savannahvargas512
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents v. Bakke angered people on both sides of the affirmative action debate? The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down some parts of affirmative action while upholding other parts. The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down use of affirmative action in medical school admissions only. The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in California but not in other states. The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in college and medical school admissions only.
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 17:30, naenae6775
Max points come fast based on what you have learned, choose each response below that correctly describes america’s economic situation at the time of the 2008 election. check all of the boxes that apply. a balanced federal budget banks in crisis economic growth growing unemployment falling home prices
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, donuteatingcat
Who was on trial at the nuremberg trials a) japanese military officials. b)nazi leaders. c) communist germans
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 23:50, astigall4272
What event ensured england safe passage to colonize north america? a) many englishmen desired more religious freedom than the king allowed. b) england's government decided to take advantage of america's wealth of resources. c) england's defeat of the spanish armada in 1588 opened up the seaways. d) cabot claimed the north atlantic coast for england in 1497.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents v. Bakke angered people on both side...
Questions in other subjects:
Physics, 03.08.2021 20:10
Mathematics, 03.08.2021 20:10
