This chart shows the number of soldiers killed according to two different sources. Source A is a book written by university
professors. Source B is from a well-known historical website.
MANI
CHAD
BASI
MAN
Number Killed Number Killed
(Source A) (Source B)
811,000 ,700,000
AM
Russia
Britain
908,371
S
France
KER
United States
913,000
1,398,000
114,000
1,100,000
2,037,000
,357,800
116,516
1,200,000
1,773,700
ELLER
Austria-Hungary
Germany
In a paragraph, explain why the data presented is different, and evaluate the reliability of each source. Which should be
used in a school research project, and why?

The data is different because history isn't always accurate from either source. The university professors have read the data the could have been changed over time while the website could change too. With the website, information can change at anytime. People could say that either source is the correct one to go by but the one that should be used in a school project should be the professors information. Usually, whatever the teacher says is correct and therefore should be used.

Explanation:

1. the group that formally abolished the monarchy was the roundheads. after the monarchy was abolished, the english commonwealth was created. it was led by oliver cromwell, who later took the title lord protector. this leader was a puritan, meaning that he supported removing catholic rituals from the church of england.

2. identify a central idea in the bill of rights.

a.   the monarch could only exercise power as stated in the law.

3. ascended the english throne as   a joint monarch after accepting   the bill of rights   mary ii

appointed catholics as government   officials and recruited them in the   army

james ii

conquered ireland and established   the commonwealth

oliver cromwell

lost a long, bloody civil war against   forces loyal to parliament

charles i

was crowned king after a period   of commonwealth rule in england

charles ii

4. identify two effects of the glorious revolution on the english monarchy.

the idea of monarchs ruling by divine right was rejected.

a limited, constitutional monarchy was established.

5. what are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings?

it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament.

it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.

sense of self-interest