What was the ruling of the Missouri court in the Dred Scott case?
A) Only Scott should be free.

B) The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.

C) The children of the Scotts would be free.

D) Only Scott's wife should be free.

B) The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.

Explanation:

In the Missouri court he was given freedom and his family but the owner of the farm's widow appealed the case and Scott appealed it to the Supreme Court where the Missouri court decision was overturned and African Americans couldn't become Americans citizens anymore and this is what led to the rise in popularity of the republican party and led to the election of Abraham Lincoln and the civil war.

lying without the limits of the several states; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!