Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a his...
History, 08.03.2020 23:38, genyjoannerubiera
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?
A. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
B. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 16:30, theresamarieuehling2
Name two fighter jets that were used by each side during the battle of the coral sea its for a project, this is due today
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 08:10, emilysmith20044
What is true about the gullah who lived in areas of colonial south carolina and georgia?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 12:30, ksanquist1212
What percentage of people in britain lived in cities in 1850? a.) less than 5% b.)between 6 and 10% c.) more than 20%
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 13:00, bbanfield1
What limits do the gospels have as a historical source
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 11.12.2019 17:31
History, 11.12.2019 17:31
