In what landmark case did the Warren Court rule that an accused criminal had the right to a lawyer whether or not the person could afford one?

A. Gideon v. Wainwright

B. Reynolds v. Sims

C. Miranda v. Arizona

D. Baker v. Carr

The answer is A This question is for those who are looking for the answer.

the correct answer is korematsu was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.

in the supreme cout’s decision in korematsu v. the united states, the court said that korematsu was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.

the court voted 6 to 3, and the decision was written by justice black. the decision was that the evacuation order that the citizen korematsu had violated was valid. it was found that the order had no racial intentions. the order was a valid measure to keep the united states safe during war times, especially the pacific west.

the options of the question were, a) was not a spy and deserved equal rights. b) was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights. c) was a spy and should be imprisioned immediately. d) was spy but was free to go back to japan.

it would have concentrated power in the executive branch of the government. it would have restored balance among the three branches of government. it would have set a precedent for government intervention in the economy. it would have signaled an end to all the programs of roosevelt’s new deal.

did this .