Why do many people still argue about the decision to drop atomic bombs on
Japan in 1945?
A. The atomic bomb had earlier been used only by Nazis.
B. Japan had already surrendered.
C. There were treaties not allowing
D. The attacks ended the war. but killed many non-soldiers.

D

Explanation: Overall, this is the main reason people still argue if America was just in dropping atomic bombs on Japan.

This answer is the best choice, as A is not logical and wouldn't make sense for people to argue over.

B is true, but is an argument people use to support D.

I'm not sure if C is true, but D is a more correct answer choice, as it's very NOT just to drop bombs if the treaties didn't allow it, because there is no plus side of things.

D is very 2 sided and can start many debates. Many people feel since it DID end the war, it's OK the US dropped the bomb. Some argue it was morally wrong to counter that argument.

during the 20th century, the role of the vice president has evolved into more of an executive branch position. now, the vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president's administration and presides over the senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.