History, 21.02.2020 03:49, jwilliamsstudent

In Harriet's country, the ten provincial states that make up the nation hold the majority of power, with a small central government handling foreign policy and trade.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

answered: nmorin603p3rhkg

federal

Explanation:

Harriet lives under a federal system of government, usually characterized by the coming together of states in which the different member states have a certain degree of independent control of their internal affairs, with their external affairs being handled by a central government. The United States, Australia, and the Federal Republic of Germany operate a federal system of government.

answered: Guest

As grandes navegações foram resultados de uma série de transformações em curso na europa desde o século xii. por meio delas , o continente europeu completou suas passagem da idade media para a idade moderna e forneceu o comércio e o uso da moeda a partir do mercantilismo.além disso as grandes navegações tornaram portugal a maior potência do mundo entre o século xv e xvi consolidando um império ultramarino. com as “ descobertas “ feitas nesse período , foi iniciada q colonização do continente americano. os portgueses , por exemplo , conquistaram colônias em diferentes partes do mundo : américa , áfrica e ásia a “ descoberta” da américa foi responsável por uma verdadeira revolução. os europeus entraram em contato com novos povos e novas culturas. esse encontro , no entanto , resultou no massacre da cultura ameríndia e da cultura africana , ambas utilizadas como não de obra escrava pelos europeus espero ter ajudado

answered: Guest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is