History
History, 20.02.2020 00:39, 2020kaylahernan

The utility of a provision of this kind, can only be vindicated on the hypothesis of a probability, at least possibility, of combination between the executive and legislature, in some scheme of usurpation. Should this at any time happen, how easy would it be to fabricate pretenses of approaching danger? Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist, no. 25 (p.124). According to this statement written by Alexander Hamilton, if the Executive and the Legislature were controlled by the same person, what would "be [easy] to fabricate"? Group of answer choices excuses to give power to the people excuses to be fair excuses to make sure people are safe excuses to take power away from the people

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:00, cardonaalfredo
One of the main problems with the indian reservation system was that government agents took land from settlers to give to american indians. dealt dishonestly with american indian families. did not understand the power structure of american indian tribes. gave land to settlers who removed american indians.
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 21:30, wambold3
What is zinn's approach to the study of history? what does he suggest occurs when history is told is the story of human progress?
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, ashquinn
True or false plebeians were the highest social class in ancient rome
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, anselmojohn4370
Hin t in the section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? he section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? ow does the writer's point of view in "the completely free market" affect the credibility of the article? a. it's written in the third person, which allows the author to examine all sides of the debate. b. since it's written in the first person, it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument. c. since it's written in the second person, it puts the reader in the writer's position, and gives the reader more to consider from this perspective. d. it's written in the first person, but is conducted as an interview with several different sources, providing a full-circle debate.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
The utility of a provision of this kind, can only be vindicated on the hypothesis of a probability,...

Questions in other subjects: