What effect did the US Supreme Court have through the Gibbons v Ogden decision?

Question options:

The Supreme Court decided that the President and not the Congress could regulate trade between the states.

The Supreme Court determined that it was unconstitutional for states to regulate national trade.

It stated that the Federal government could not regulate commercial activity between the states.

It stated that the Federal government, through the actions of the Congress, could regulate commercial activity between the states.

It stated that the Federal government, through the actions of the Congress, could regulate commercial activity between the states.

Explanation:

In the Gibbons v Ogden decision, the US Supreme Court stated that the Federal government, through the actions of the Congress, could regulate commercial activity between the states.

Gibbons and Ogden were business partnersThey bought a route between New York and Elizabethtown from Fulton and LivingstonBut Gibbons betrayed OgdenGibbons operated his own two ships on the same routeOgden received the franchise from Fulton and LivingstonGibbons justified that he had separate federal licenseOgden sued Gibbons in New York State Court to force him to stop operating his steamship routeThe New York State court agreed and issued an injunction against GibbonsGibbons then appealed to the Supreme Court to help him keep operating his routeGibbons was represented by the famous lawyer Daniel WebsterWebster argued that the federal law was supreme above all state lawsAccording to the Constitution, Congress has the ability to regulate interstate commerceThe Federal government, through the actions of the Congress, could regulate commercial activity between the states