In schmerber v. california, the supreme court when police ordered a doctor to draw blood from a suspect charged with drunken driving.
a. found it violated the 14th amendment
b. had no objection
c. objected to the lack of a warrant
d. found it violated the 5th amendment

Correct answer is b. had no objection.

Explanation:

Hello!

In 1966, Schmerber v California became a historical case of the US Supreme Court.

According to its opinion, the Court expressed that:

The blood sample taken without consent did not violate the 4th Amendment, because it was a case of "demanding circumstances".  Intrusions in the human body require a court order, but in this case, the police acted under the exception of "demanding circumstances".Finally, the admission of a blood sample as evidence does not imply self-incrimination, so the right of the 5th Amendment was not violated.

Success in your homework!

The answer is c socialist