How was slavery different in africa than it was in america

answer: in africa, slavery was a result of debt, war crimes, or criminal activity. african slavery was vital to life; it played a huge role in society.

"in sub-saharan africa, the slave relationships were often complex, with rights and freedoms given to individuals held in slavery and restrictions on sale and treatment by their masters."

this is obviously very different from american slavery, where slaves were seen as property and a status symbol. the more slaves you had, the better off you were. slaves were bought for life, and often times their children would be born into the household for life as well. slaves had no rights; many were treated inhumanely and brutally.

hope this information

explanation:

the transatlantic slave trade radically impaired africa's potential to develop economically and maintain its social and political stability. the arrival of europeans on the west african coast and their establishment of slave ports in various parts of the continent triggered a continuous process of exploitation of africa's human resources, labor, and commodities. this exploitative commerce influenced the african political and religious aristocracies, the warrior classes and the biracial elite, who made small gains from the slave trade, to participate in the oppression of their own people. the europeans, on the other hand, greatly benefited from the atlantic trade, since it allowed them to amass the raw materials that fed the industrial revolution to the detriment of african societies whose capacity to transform their modes of production into a viable entrepreneurial economy was severely halted.

first one the food administration