History, 21.01.2020 01:31, sethjohnson386pbnm3x

The justinian code is important because it is a

a. legal system many european countries have used that organizes and explains the laws
b. military system that is still currently used throughout the world.
c. guide for the education of children that has influenced eastern european school
d. set of rules for people who practice medicine that doctors use today

which of the following is a reason the byzantine empire declined?

a. the roman catholic church took over the byzantine church.

b. the byzantine empire came to adopt latin culture.

c. the byzantine church split from the roman catholic church.

d. the roman catholic church sent missionaries to convert people to christianity.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

answered: savannah19dw

The legal system in many European countries is used to organize and explain the laws.

The Byzantine Church split from the Roman Catholic Church.

Explanation:

The legal system in many European countries is used to organize and explain the laws.Emperor Justinian used the previous laws of the Roman Empire and audited them. He also introduced certain newspapers, and with the help of legal experts from the empire, Justinian's code was created. The law is a cornerstone for the further development of legitimate science. From the 12th century, we can trace its widespread use in Europe. He is still involved in the legal framework of many countries around the world. The Byzantine Church split from the Roman Catholic Church. The church schism (also known as the great schism) occurred in 1054 AD. It is an event that divided the church into east and west. This event is not the first to do a religious split between east and west, but it is undoubtedly the most significant and with consequences that are still evident today.

answered: Guest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answered: Guest

that would be the steamboat because none of the other things are forms of transportation