How did woodrow wilson's fourteen points differ from the paris peace
conference agreements?
a. the fourteen points limited the size of countries' militaries, while
the paris peace conference decided that strong militaries were
necessary to prevent future wars.
o
b. the fourteen points argued that no country should be punished
for the war, while the paris peace conference called for harsh
punishments for germany.
o
c. the fourteen points called for self-determination in austro-
hungarian territory, while the paris peace conference divided this
territory between other european empires.
d. the fourteen points supported the establishment of a league of
nations, while the paris peace conference refused to accept any
international organizations.

The correct answer is letter B

Under the treaty of the 14 points, nations should no longer enter into diplomatic agreements that are not publicly recognized. In addition, he believed that free navigation and deliberate trade between nations would strengthen the link and international cooperation. With regard to militarism, he believed that military apparatus should be restricted only to what was necessary for the maintenance of national security.

While  the Paris Peace Conference was the meeting held from January 18, 1919. The main objective of this meeting was to agree on conditions of peace with the countries of the axis, among them Great Britain, France and the United States.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

what are the answers