1. would you participate in a boycott against a company that does business
with a repressive government? why or why not?
2. would you support economics sanctions against a country that violates
human rights? why or why not?

Socially responsible behavior implies a person’s awareness of the fullness of the requirements imposed on him by society, the state, and those around him, and not only awareness, but also the fulfillment of these requirements. Otherwise, a response occurs of the environment in which the individual is located and acts. Hence the right of society to social control over the actions of its members, their compliance with historically established or consciously formed standards. The value of social responsibility lies in the fact that it is intended to discipline members of society, to encourage them to positive, conscious, useful behavior. Collaboration of business with authoritarian regimes is the socially irresponsible behavior of the company, and socially responsible citizens can boycott such a company.

Often sanctions are seen by politicians as an alternative to the use of military force, accompanied by lower costs, but no less effective in terms of achieving the intended goals. The success of the sanctions cannot be measured by the amount of economic damage inflicted on the recipient country if the purpose of the sanctions is to change the political course of the country. In the event that a country violates human rights, the imposition of sanctions seems appropriate and deserves support.

Explanation:

question 10: the answer is c, to their constituents address a problem.

question 11: i think it would be domestic bills, which deal with american issues only and public bills, which affect the whole nation.

yes u so smart, u no need me me slant eye is hard to open when i read u q