History
History, 08.01.2020 09:31, bugbug26

How did courts once interpret the equal protection clause to rule in favor of
laws that segregated white americans and african americans?
o
a. they argued that equal protection required groups of citizens to
be protected from one another if the groups disagreed.
o
b. they decided that equal protection referred only to laws that
affected citizens' fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech.
o
c. they argued that only the federal government was required to
provide equal protection of the laws.
o
d. they claimed that the laws treated both groups equally because
neither could use the services and facilities designated for the
other group.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 13:30, JS28boss
The diagram below describes a series of events during the 1700s
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 16:30, rosetoheart2
Which option most accurately explains roosevelt’s motivation in forming the bull moose party? a. he thought that president taft had failed to continue his policies of progressive reform. b. he thought president taft’s conservation legislation was effective but poorly timed. c. he wanted to change president taft’s foreign policy toward asia. d. he saw that president taft focused on antitrust legislation to the exclusion of other reforms.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:30, juliannabartra
Which is true about the monroe doctrine?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, davidsantos3121
What group elected their first democratic member of congress under the new deal coalition? a- northern blue collar workers b- african americans c- native americans d- poor southern whites
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
How did courts once interpret the equal protection clause to rule in favor of
laws that segreg...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 07:30
Konu
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 07:30