Briefly describe one major difference between du bois and littwack’s interpretations of reconstruction ?

One major difference between Du Bois and Littwack’s interpretations of Reconstruction was:

- DuBois argues that African Americans gained little from Reconstruction. They fought in the Civil War to protect White Americans' economic interests, and they received little in return. African Ams desired land as a source of economic security but did not receive it.

- Litwack argues that African Americans experienced significant gains from Reconstruction, starting with their freedom. As a result, they could take control of their lives in ways that they never could before.

For further information about  Du Bois and Littwack’s  refer to the link:

link

Du Bois and Litwack have a facsimile of difference in their theory of reconstruction.

Explanation:

Litwack has described the dependency and inter relations of African-Americans with poor White Americans during the emancipation proclamation and Civil war. Where as, Du Bois in his intricate and concise theory has argued about the position of black Americans during civil war, and how the picture was said to be painted of worker based/ruled democracy and came out as slavery held economy. He has also written the benefits of reconstruction affecting and influencing black Americans.

federal power is further limited with a system of checks and balances that gives each branch of government a measure of power over the others.

explanation:

no options provided, here,but the answer to this question is often: a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy.

clearly from the answer, the historian alludes to historical sources,and records to aid in analyzing and drawing conclusion on the effect of the war on the economy of japan.