Was the boston tea party a civil disobedience

Yes.

Explanation:

The partakers were refusing to pay tea taxes. They were disobeying the law and caused a uprising.  They were unhappy.

"Civil disobedience can be defined as action taken by individuals to illustrate their dissatisfaction with certain laws or rules as a peaceful demonstration. It could be in the form of refusal to comply with certain policies or refusal to pay certain fines."  

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

(e) a major consequence of the election was that several southern states