History
History, 22.09.2019 16:30, 19wawrzkeek

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
a. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
b. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
c. to hear about the event from someone whi was directly involved
d. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

answer
Answers: 1

Similar questions

Do you know the correct answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Geography, 29.09.2020 08:01
Konu
Mathematics, 29.09.2020 08:01
Konu
Mathematics, 29.09.2020 08:01