Which of the following correctly describes the anti-federalist position on including the bill of rights?

it would protect states from possible abuses of government.
it could be added later after the constitution itself was approved by the states.
it wasn't necessary because the constitution strictly limited government power.
it would give the constitution more support from european allies.

will give brainleist to first right answer.

"It would protect states from possible abuses of government" correctly describes the Anti-Federalist position on including the Bill of Rights.

Option A

Explanation:

Anti-Federalism is the movement from late 18th century which was highlighted for its opposition towards creation of stronger U.S. federal government. To resolve these objections, the Bill of Rights amendments were attached to the constitution.

This was power, which was given to state by providing guarantees of personal independence and rights, rectified limitations on the power of government in judicial. Thus, this weakens power of federal government and in this way anti-federalist movement was succeeding to fulfil its agenda.

it would be a. that is the only one i could think of