How did prohibition and the scopes trial reflect the effort to preserve traditional social values ?

Prohibition was promoted by very religious protestant communities. They argued that alcohol deteriorated traditional social values because it promoted debauchery, adultery, loss of family values, and corruption. Prohibitionists thought that banning alcohol would result in a better society, with higher moral standards and ethics.

The Scopes Trial reflected the tension, which still lives to this day, between fundamentalist christians and modernist christians and secular people over the issue of evolution. Fundamentalists believe that evolution should not be taught because it conflicts with the bible. The bible says that man was created by God, and evolution argues that humans are an animal species, closely related to other great apes.

Modernists and seculars either argue that the bible does not conflict with evolution at all, or that evolution should be taught instead of creationism because evolution has a scientific basis while evolution does not.

im not sure

step-by-step explanation: s

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)