Why was it difficult for the political and financial leaders of europe to end imperialism?

a. political leaders did not want to appear too lenient and financial leaders did not want to appear too soft.

b. financial and political leaders enjoyed the benefits of imperialsim too much to cease this activity.

c. financial and political leaders did not believe that these countries had enough knowledge to control themselves.

d. political and financial leaders did not feel that they had accomplished all that they had set out to do for the native people.

b. Financial and political leaders enjoyed the benefits of imperialsim too much to cease this activity.

Explanation:

Let´s look at recent history. After the end of WWII, Britain and France strove for regaining control of their colonial posessions in Africa and Asia. But their might and influence was severly undermined by the war. Britain gave independence to its colonies in the 1950s and 1960s, and the French were forced to recognize Algerian independence after a long and bloody war, and they were soundly defeated by the Vietnamese Communists in 1954  and forced to recognize North Vietnam as an independent country.

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!

du boi was considered a radical because he wanted the immediate end for segregation. the biggest different between him and booker t. washington is that, even though washington believed that segregation should be considered illegal, he did not believe at all that a law was needed to keep blacks away from whites and that this would be something natural (to have the races apart) for a long time until society adjusted, while du boi believe that agitation was the only way to end segregation.