How was the roman republic different from athenian direct democracy

In the Athens citizens voted for politicians to represent them, while in the Roman  Republic citizens voted on the laws themselves directly.

Explanation:

I would contend that the greatest likeness between the Roman and Athenian political frameworks lies in the chronicled setting which underlines the development of Athenian majority rules system and the Roman Republic.

In a specific way, it appears that the two frameworks were intended to attempt to address comparable difficulties and answer a comparative inquiry, in spite of the fact that their particular answers were profoundly not the same as each other.  

It ought to be noticed that Athens was not constantly a majority rules system. Actually, Athens had recently been distinguished and was one of various Greek polises that fell under the influence of Tyrants—people who had the option to hold onto control of a given Polis.

This history is significant, in light of the fact that piece of what loaned Athenian majority rule government its extreme nature was this history, since it was not constantly popularity based and fell under the spell of strongmen (most quite Pisistratus).

Thoughts like Ostricism, or the determinations by part—Athenian vote based system was structured so that at whatever point conceivable, power would be weakened to such an extent, that future Tyrants and Oligarchs could never be allowed to rise. Vote based system advanced because of genuine inquiries and difficulties.  

In like manner, we find in Roman history a comparable dynamic, with the Republic being gone before by a semi incredible time of lords, and similarly as with Athens, there are sure components of the Roman Republic which appear to be intended to limit the centralization of intensity.

Most quite, there was the choice of two delegates, each for a term of just a single year, and every one of whom had the capacity to veto each other's activities.  

Obviously, the political frameworks themselves were very unique. In any case, it seems to me that there's a contention to be made that the two political frameworks needed to advance to respond to comparative inquiries and comparable concerns, regardless of whether they came to answers altogether different from each other.  

The Athenian city-state was an immediate majority rule government. For one-year terms, 500 Athenian residents (men, explicitly) would be chosen for lead in the Boule. Note that they were chosen by lottery, so this isn't excessively like our popularity based procedure today. They would meet in the upper public square (consider it like a commercial center) and vote utilizing shards of stoneware.

can you tell me all of statements so i can answer this for you.

until then have a great week.

                                  : }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }: }