Why was the concept of manifest destiny controversial when it was first outlined?

Manifest Destiny is the belief that Americans had the right to expand westward across the North American continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. The concept of this was controversial when first outlined because some citizens didn't like the idea of "invading" the whole continent. Most people didn't like the idea of change and wanted to remain neutral.

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality.