What could happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the state court, rather than in a federal court?

Concurrent jurisdiction allows more than one court to have the authority to hear the same case

Explanation:

Concurrent jurisdiction permits more than one court to have the power to listen to a similar case. This happens in typical cases, just as criminal cases. In numerous states, an individual can sue for a separation in the nearby locale level court, family court, or any of the area courts in the country. Remember, that each of the 50 states and the U.S. Domains reserves the option to choose their courts' locale so that it will differ state to state.

Since a decent variety locale gives both the state and the national government ward over the area, the groups and the topic of the case, at that point, both court frameworks can hear the case.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What would happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the State court, rather than in a federal court, is that the two different courts -State and Federal- have the faculty to hear the same case. It doesn't matter if it is a criminal case or a civil case. Litigants can decide the court they feel most comfortable to air their differences.

the answer to fill in the blank in this question would be the word resource, it is defined as the money, material or people (since human resource is a very valuable good) that a company or a person has at disposition (meaning they can use the resource as they see fit), to be able to complete a task or achieve a goal.  

a. always outside of government control.