History
History, 27.09.2019 23:20, emelylug033

The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that have submitted
cases for the court's review. the justices then select about
75 cases to more fully review and decide. for each case,
the justices debate the facts and then vote on a ruling. the
court rules in favor of whichever side is supported by the
majority of the justices. one justice then writes a majority
opinion, summarizing the court's reasoning. justices who
disagree with the ruling may write their own dissenting
opinions to explain their objections.
which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this
description of the supreme court's decision-making process?
o
a. the supreme court is required to make a decision on every case
that is appealed to it.
o
b. two-thirds of the justices have to agree on a ruling rather than a
simple majority
o
c. the supreme court does not hear public arguments before
deciding which cases to review
o
d. dissenting opinions are written by lawyers representing the losing
party rather than justices.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:00, cortneykeeler
Which best explains charles i's actions after parliament refused him war funds
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:00, jaymoria16
Choosing to engage in military action to assist another country is an example of sanctions. internationalism. o isolationism. o diplomacy.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, Serenitybella
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the united states and south korea today?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, rowellr3
31/3: which equation has the solutions x =?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that hav...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 07.05.2020 07:04
Konu
Mathematics, 07.05.2020 07:04