Draw conclusions why was a bill of rights not
included in the original constitution? why might the
anti-federalists have wanted a bill of rights in the
document?

answer: federalists argued that the constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. anti-federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

explanation:

"the royal proclamation of 1763"