Why didn’t the leaders of the united states opt to simply revise or improve the articles of confederation in 1787?
great britain had recognized the weakness of the united states under the articles of confederation and was planning to attack and conquer the country.
the citizens of every state signed petitions demanding that their leaders scrap the articles of confederation and create a new plan of government.
they accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the one created by the articles of confederation could provide.
the articles of confederation had always been envisioned as a temporary document, not a long-term plan for the country’s government.

They accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation could provide.

Explanation:

The correct answer is C) They accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation could provide.

Leaders of the United States did not opt to simply revise or improve the Articles of Confederation in 1787 because "They accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation could provide."

The Articles of Confederated had left a weak central government that practically could not do anything important. Under the Articles, the States maintained their sovereignty and were the ones that could collect money through taxes. When the Central government, the Congress, needed money, it had to ask the States for it. That is why the US leaders met at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to create the new Constitution.

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.