History, 19.09.2019 20:00, kaykayhodge

Many historians have accused gengis khan and the mongols of being murderous barbarians who did nothing more than wreak havoc and destruction on the civilizations with which they came into contact. would you consider them guilty or not guilty of this charge? why or why not?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 14:20, tinajackson3346

What does this map indicate about the crusades? (1 point) the crusades were a direct result of muslim conquest of jerusalem. o much of the holy land had been under muslim control for centuries before the crusades began. the crusades were a direct result of muslim invasion of tours. japan land bordering the mediterranean sea was not a concern for crusaders.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 15:50, blacksabbath6922

Look at this photograph taken during the battle of guadalcanal

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:30, gracie2492

What practical concern lay behind the promotion of longitudinally planned churches in 17th-century rome? a) allowing the circulation of pilgrimsb) interior lighting of the navec) support for the heavy domed) accommodating parishioners

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 09:00, miyahhh123

What role did consumerism play in the early growth of capitalism?

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Many historians have accused gengis khan and the mongols of being murderous barbarians who did nothi...