Sumer was a decentralized collection of city-states. what does this mean? question 8 options: a) each city-state had it's own god. b) there was a single capital city. c) there was no single ruler of the whole region. d) they only traded within the city.

C) There was no single ruler of the whole region

Explanation:

The Sumerian civilization was established in the valley of the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. This is the civilization that is considered to be the first one in the world, and the one that contributed to the rise of the other civilizations in the region. It was a civilization that was united under one ruler though, but instead it was designed in the manner of city-states. Each city-state had its own ruler and governing body which was functioning independently from the other city states, so Sumer was actually decentralized. The fact that each city-state had its own ruler was not an obstacle at all, as all of the Sumerian city-states were in good relations, constant contact, and they collaborated and supported each other. It might have even worked for the better that there was not a single ruler, as the power was never in the hands of only one person, thus a tyranny was avoided.

tenochtitlan (also spelled tenochtitlán), located on an island near the western shore of lake texcoco in central mexico, was the capital city and religious centre of the aztec civilization. the traditional founding date of the city was 1345 ce and it remained the most important aztec centre until its destruction at the hands of the conquering spanish led by hernán cortés in 1521 ce, which led to the final collapse of the aztec empire.

the soviet union wanted to impose communist governments in eastern europe.