I’m doing a practice and i’m stuck on this.
federalists and anti-federalists made different arguments about the new government. drag each argument to the correct group
i believe that federalists wanted a strong central government.
i believe that anti-federalists didn’t want the federal government to be to powerful.
i’m just stuck on who thinks direct democracy is best and who thinks republicanism is best.
if someone could that would be great : )

Federalists:

A stronger national government.

Needs the new Constitution.

Anti-Federalists:

The national government shouldn't be too powerful.

The new Constitution gives too much power to the national government.

Explanation:

These are the answers to question 28 l on the History semester exam review for connexus.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.