Which describes a difference in the rule of constantine and diocletian? constantine appeased foreign invaders by giving them land, while diocletian went on the offensive to stop the attacks. constantine divided the empire into western and eastern halves, while diocletian further split the country into four regions. constantine divided the empire and shared emperor duties, while diocletian reunited the empire and served as sole ruler. constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

The correct answer is D) Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

The statement that describes a difference in the rule of Constantine and Diocletian was that Constantine reunited the empire and served as sole ruler, while Diocletian divided the empire and shared emperor duties.

Constantine I was the Roman Emperor from 306 to 337 CE. He reunited the split empire. What happened was that Emperor Diocletian had split the Roman Empire with different rulers in order to better control the territories. So Constantine reunited the Roman territories again under one government, changing the Capital from Rome to what would be Constantinople. Although the many renovations in the city, Constantine thought that Rome was old and did not want to stay there, that is why he chose Byzantium as the new place.

ok i will try

explanation:

ewr rr r r r r r r r rrr