What was the difference between the salt-ii and start talks? a. salt-ii was discussion of ending testing of weapons but the start focused on eliminating weapons. b. the salt-ii discussed limiting the production while the start discussed elimination. d. salt-ii talk discussed the ending of weapons while the start discussed the limiting of production. c. salt-ii discussed the elimination of weapons while the start discussed limiting weapons testing. d. salt-ii talk discussed the ending of weapons while the start discussed the limiting of production.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

what are the options mate?

explanation:

not to be rude or anything but, nobody can really answer that if you don't add the options sorry if it came of rude uwu

the national congress's powers over the states were specific and definite: it had the sole power to negotiate treaties, declare war, and make peace. all powers not granted to congress were reserved for state governments. congress had no power to levy taxes, for example.

agree with wilson that weakening the treaty would threaten world peace.