History
History, 24.06.2019 01:20, btaylor1179

(asap apex) in sum, we hold that the district's ban on handgun possession in the home violates the second amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense. assuming that heller is not disqualified from the exercise of second amendment rights, the district must permit him to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home.3 what does the author of this excerpt most likely believe? o a. any law placing limits on handgun ownership violates the second amendment o b. a citizen's right to bear arms overrides a city's interest in protecting public safety o c. individual states may prohibit firearm ownership, but the federal government cannot o d. firearms are highly dangerous and must be strictly regulated by state and federal governments.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 18:50, maddiemccarter3892
John locke would have agreed with all of the following statemens except
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:00, jaquiel3325
If the united states became a "majority-minority” nation, o whites would be the majority, but there would still be ethnic minorities. there would be an equal number of whites and ethnic minorities. othere would be more ethnic minorities in the population than whites. o no one would be considered white or part of an ethnic minority group.
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, logicalness243
The chart shows data on the construction of dreadnoughts, or armed battleships, by 1914. (look at chart provided) a logical conclusion that can be drawn from this chart is that britain and germany were a.)engaged in an arms race. b.)looking for ways to cooperate. c.)hoping not to fight on land. d.)the strongest nations on the earth.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, starfox5454
What was the difference between bombing military targets in the united kingdom, and bombing the city of london? a. bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't b. bombing military targets didn't force the u. k. to surrender, but bombing london did c. military targets were bombed by japan, while london was bombed by the nazis d. london was bombed before the u. s. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
(asap apex) in sum, we hold that the district's ban on handgun possession in the home violates the...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 28.07.2019 19:30