Aperson who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most support which conclusion? (article and answer choices in picture)

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.

The court has a duty to protect student's right to free speech.

Explanation: Based on the situation if a person agree to the dissenting opinion in this case would support that court has a duty protect the student's right for freedom of speech.

Because censoring the student's speech regarding on any issue violates the right of a citizen's freedom of speech. Like on the name of teaching moral and political value if the conversation of the students is stifled then it is the violation of their right.

Because the state can not enact any law which is violating the freedom of speech. If it happens in any case the court has the duty to make sure the freedom of speech of the student.Because the court can intercept the law.

c

explanation:

a) the colonists began to see themselves as different from people in britain.