President carter’s foreign policy failures included not being able to bring egypt and israel together. not being able to bring home the iranian hostages. not being able to promote détente with china. not bringing the shah of iran to the united states.

Answer

Hi,

President Carter’s foreign policy failures included  not being able to bring home the Iranian Hostages

Explanation

President Carter had strong believe in the rule of law as applied in international issues and people’s self-determination. His focus was to make the United States a leading nation in promotion of human rights.He advocated for less use of military interventions and an improving relationship between the U.S and the Soviet Union.

In the Iranian hostage crisis, 52 Americans were held hostages in a seizure by the Iranian militants at the U.S Embassy in Tehran.President’s Carters attempt to rescue them failed and hostages were taken to hideouts in the country.This was taken as a major failure.

In 1981 elections Reagan won with many votes defeating Carter, and during his inauguration , the hostages that were in captive for 444 days were released. However, Carter’s foreign policy achievement  is still remembered ; during the Yom Kippur War in 1973 it made Israel disengage their armies and returned back to the Sinai Peninsula ending the war.

Best Wishes!

The correct answer on Edgen is:

(B.) not being able to bring home the Iranian hostages.

I just took the test and this is the right answer.

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.