History
History, 03.02.2020 14:43, sassyparker1216

The excerpt is from a un report on human rights violations in north korea.

the gravity, scale, and nature of these violations reveal a state that does not have any parallel in the contemporary world.

–office of the high commissioner for human rights, 2014

which explains why the commission came to this conclusion?

a) it found that north korean officials prevented food, medicine, and other international aid from reaching citizens.

b) it found that north korean officials murdered, starved and tortured thousands of prisoners of war.

c) it found that north korean officials stockpiled weapons and completed nuclear tests in violation of international law.

d) it found that north korean officials murdered, starved and tortured thousands of people in secret prison camps.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 20:50, bradydodson47
What is the relationship between the supreme court and the lower courts? the supreme court must abide by the decisions of the lower courts. the supreme court appoints judges to the lower courts. the supreme court can overrule decisions made by the lower courts the supreme court can impeach judges from the lower courts.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, fish64
The military dictatorship inviolently reacted to the opposition of the maya, who demanded greater rights for their native population. the genocide inresulted from a struggle between arab nomadic tribes and non-arab agricultural groups. the tutsi were the victims of genocide inat the hands of the hutu rulers.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, donny34
How did the opposing sides of the revolutionary war compare
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:30, zamorano5912
Read this passage: the president has asked congress to consider a new antiterrorism law. the law would give law enforcement agencies more freedom to monitor suspected terrorists' phone calls, text messages, and internet usage. the law's supporters claim that it is an essential tool to keep americans safe from terrorism. its opponents claim that it infringes on their civil liberties by stripping them of the right to privacy. which action would the party opposing the president most likely take to resolve this issue? a. encourage its members to publicly attack the law to sway public opinion against it b. begin a campaign to have the president removed from office because of his proposal c. take the matter to federal court to prevent the party from having to support it d. demand that public safety issues be left to the states rather than the federal government (apex)
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
The excerpt is from a un report on human rights violations in north korea.

the gravity,...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 19:40
Konu
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 19:40