What was the result of “bleeding kansas”?

popular sovereignty was a proslavery policy that consistently angered northerners.

popular sovereignty was a good practice for proslavery territories applying for statehood.

popular sovereignty was a peaceful way for kansas voters to decide on the issue of slavery.

popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of kansas and nebraska.

Explanation:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery.  In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.

After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred.  The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed that occurred in this situation.  The move to make slavery a popular sovereignty matter proved to be unworkable and hurtful.

answer: me

explanation:

because it’s me

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation: