Which statement best describes the result of the election of 1824?

-no candidate received a majority in the election so the electoral college had to revote.
-there were only two candidates running for president of the united states.
-because no one met the constitutional requirement for winning, the election was decided in the house of representatives.
-henry clay knew he would not win so he threw his support to andrew jackson, which made him the next president of the united states.

The correct answer is C) because no one met the constitutional requirement for winning, the election was decided in the House of Representatives.

The statement that best describes the result of the election of 1824 is the following: "because no one met the constitutional requirement for winning, the election was decided in the House of Representatives."

The United States presidential election of 1824 was controversial. Neither candidate met the constitutional requirement for winning and that is why the election had to be decided in the House of Representatives. This means that neither candidate won the electoral vote. That is how candidate John Quincy Adams won the presidency, instead of candidate Andrew Jackson. The other two candidates were Henry Clay and William H. Crawford.  

porter is writing economic history because he is focusing on the cost of developing vaccines.

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)