Which option most accurately explains/describes decisions that led to the second new deal? the roosevelt administration believed the first new deal did not go far enough to repair the economy and created more programs. the supreme court believed that the first new deal violated the constitution that led to new constitutional legislation. state governments found the first new deal incapable of solving economic woes and created regional legislation to solve the economic crisis. the united states congress believed that roosevelt’s first new deal was insufficient for handling the economic crisis and created its own new deal legislation.

The correct answer is C) State governments found the First New Deal incapable of solving economic woes and created regional legislation to solve the economic crisis.

The option that most accurately explains/describes decisions that led to the Second New Deal is "State governments found the First New Deal incapable of solving economic woes and created regional legislation to solve the economic crisis."

The Second New Deal was the series of programs form 1935 to 1939, created by the administration Franklin D. Roosevelt, to help the ones in need after the terrible consequences of the Great Depression, and that corrected some failures of the First New Deal (1933-1934.)

The Second New Deal legislation that was passed was the Works Progress Administration (WPA), Social Security Act, the National Labor Relations Act, the Rural Electrification Administration, and Fair Labor Standards Act.

i think you may have asked this twice, but i answered one of the

possible the invasion of room could have been avodiable but the people of rome were to stubboron and to wealthy the kingdoms saw them as a threat if they dialred it downa   bit ten i dont think they wouldnt failed   china was not iacvvdoaible they caused war to much and were out of hand therefor that must have happened india i dont really know it could of