History
History, 13.11.2019 20:31, ashleyjohnson2002

Washington had a lot to say about involvement with foreign nations. what distinction does he make between permanent alliances and temporary alliances?

this will with the question read it plz

to have revenue there must be taxes--that no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient & unpleasant--that the intrinsic embarrassment inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties) ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.

observe good faith & justice towards all nations. cultivate peace & harmony with all--religion & morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? it will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice & benevolence. who can doubt that in the course of time and things the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? can it be, that providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue? the experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?
prosperity in the toils of european ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or caprice?

'tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with any portion of the foreign world--so far, i mean, as we are now at liberty to do it--for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements, (i hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best repeat it, therefore, let those engagements. be observed in their genuine sense. but in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. but even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favours or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing & diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing with powers so disposed--in order to give to trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them--conventional rules of intercourse;

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 14:00, rydro6019
Read the passage below and answer the following question. the wars against carthage changed rome significantly. the roman senate had gained in power and respect compared to the other parts of the government. the romans emerged from the punic wars with the understanding that final authority over the military lay with the senate. also, the amount of land they controlled had grown. rome now considered spain as part of its territory, and it began what would become a long struggle to conquer the people of spain. the second war and carthage’s march through europe reduced the number of people in the italian countryside. men had gone off to war. people had died and people had moved to the cities to escape war. the new arrivals in the city of rome enjoyed the festivals and other public entertainment that were created to keep citizens happy during the dark days of the war. newcomers favored the city over the life of difficulty they had known working on farms. and after the war ended, many veterans from farming families decided to stay in cities, especially rome, rather than return to the countryside. cities in italy became overcrowded, and rome became the most populous city in europe and west asia. with the migration to the cities, farmland in italy could be bought cheaply. those with wealth began buying this farmland and increased their use of slaves to work those farms. many small farmers found themselves unable to compete with the larger farms and their large number of slaves. many small farmers gave up, sold their farms and joined the movement to the cities. passage taken and modified from: macrohistory : worldhistory website. rome went through many changes as a result of the punic wars. using the text above, summarize the main points about these changes. use at least four complete sentences and evidence from the text in your answer. (75 points)
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, ctyrector
In 150-200 words, name three advancements made by the egyptians and tell how they impacted the culture.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, leannaadrian
Wich statement about the delegates at the constitutional convention is accurate
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:10, alfarodougoy8lvt
By the year 1900 new york city had more than just people of british heritage. there were more people of italian descent than the cities of florence, genoa and venice put together. it was home to more irish than dublin (the capital of ireland) and more germans than hamburg. joining them were many thousands of people of polish, hungarian, and czech descent. what term best describes new york cities changing culture? a a pot of chili b a bowl of sugar c a cup of coffee d a slice of cheese
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Washington had a lot to say about involvement with foreign nations. what distinction does he make be...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 19.12.2020 23:20
Konu
Mathematics, 19.12.2020 23:20
Konu
Chemistry, 19.12.2020 23:20